It is confidently wrong
Standard AI produces plausible answers that are factually wrong. In tax, a confident wrong answer inside a client deliverable is a malpractice claim waiting to happen. A firm cannot stake its reputation on probability.

From classification to filing to audit defence. Every output grounded in the legal text as it stood on the transaction date, and defensible years after the decision was made.
Three reasons a firm cannot put ChatGPT or Copilot into tax work — and the question every partner asks before signing off on any of it.
Standard AI produces plausible answers that are factually wrong. In tax, a confident wrong answer inside a client deliverable is a malpractice claim waiting to happen. A firm cannot stake its reputation on probability.
When the auditor asks where a number came from, you need an answer that holds. Generic AI is a black box — you cannot show your work, which makes the output unusable in anything that reaches a tax authority or an audit committee.
Ministry letters, court rulings and EU directives land continuously. A rules-engine vendor ships on their cadence, not the law's, and your firm absorbs the gap by hand until the workaround becomes permanent.
The buyer's question: how do I get the productivity of AI without taking on liability my partners will not accept?
Your tax engine touches 100% of transactions but only applies the treatment it was configured with. Whether the characterisation is right — reverse charge, chain transaction, place of supply — is expert judgment, and nobody has the hours to examine everything. So everyone samples.
GraphBit puts that judgment into the validation layer: every transaction examined, ruled against the law in force on the transaction date, with the derivation attached.
VAT is where most firms start. It is not where the engine stops — the same graph, guardrails and record apply from classification to filing to audit defence.
Local Files generated and validated to OECD standard. The platform reads your transaction matrix, detects the controlled transaction types, maps intercompany agreements to their matching benchmark studies, selects the right chapters per jurisdiction, and generates the file with method-specific narrative for your expert to review.
Tariff-code classification validated against the full legal corpus — TARIC, the Combined Nomenclature, HSEN and CNEN explanatory notes, and binding EBTI decisions. Free-text product descriptions matched through the legal hierarchy, not by resemblance.
Working papers assembled, referenced and defensible by construction. Dozens of documents per case — payslips, tax certificates, receipts, contracts, foreign authority letters — ingested in bulk across PDF, Excel, image and email, and classified into your firm's own categories.
Financial data extracted from unstructured documents into validated, referenced structure. Statements, schedules and correspondence become fields your downstream systems can consume, with each value tied back to where it came from.
Status TK
Conversational access to the knowledge graph. Your team asks a question in plain language and gets an answer drawn from the versioned legal text — not from a model's recollection of it.
Status TK
Substantive validation of 100% of indirect-tax transactions — reverse charge, chain transactions, place of supply — against the law in force on the transaction date.
Every product in the suite returns the same four states, so a reviewer learns the system once and it holds everywhere. Correct answers get a verdict too — that is what makes the coverage claim real.
Your experts receive findings, not workload. What the engine cannot verify against the law it hands over with the analysis already done — the reviewer rules on the question, not on the paperwork around it.
Every invoice becomes structured, machine-readable data. A systematic error then leaves the same footprint on every invoice, cross-matched at both counterparties.
Germany phases in mandatory B2B e-invoicing for issuance; France, Poland and Belgium add reporting regimes.
Digital reporting for cross-border transactions across the entire EU — every invoice structured and machine-readable.
Sampling stops being a defensible control. Validating every transaction becomes the standard your audit is measured against.
There is a law. There is a date. Validation stops being optional.
Independent annual audit of our security controls — the standard your IT and procurement teams expect from any vendor handling client data.
Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange, required by automotive manufacturers and among the strictest enterprise data security standards in Europe.
Record-keeping (Art. 12), human oversight (Art. 14) and robustness (Art. 15) under the EU AI Act, implemented at platform level. Your use is defensible from day one.
Every classification, calculation and rule application is recorded with an immutable timestamp. Any past decision can be reproduced exactly, on demand.
Personal and confidential data is tokenised inside your environment before any external model contact. Client data does not leave your compliance perimeter.
The working session: bring a sample of your real transactions and we run them live. No slideware — you leave with verdicts and the derivation behind each one.
Certified and assessed
Or start with the engine underneath: how GraphBit works →