Book a demo

Every transaction checked, not a sample.

A regulatory update, EU Council Directive 2024/512, waiting on a reviewer with its proposed rule change attached.
A single transaction, TX-24-05-0388, passing its deterministic rule check with the expected and reported VAT agreeing.
The VAT compliance dashboard: the period's pass rate, the value validated, the transactions at risk and the exposure they carry.
Process
A manual review reaching two of six transaction rows; the other four are not reviewed.

The Problem

Most tax teams can't review every transaction by hand, so they check a sample and hope the rest holds up. An error in the untested majority isn't found until an authority looks by then it's a penalty, not a fix.

VAT validation reaching all six transaction rows, each checked.

The Solution

Every transaction gets the same substantive check, not a sample, so nothing sits undiscovered until an authority finds it.

How GraphBit VAT Validation solves it

Every transaction, not a sample

The same substantive check runs on 100% of transactions (not the 1-5% a manual review can reach) because the engine's cost per check doesn't scale with headcount.

Says “requires review,” not a guess

Cases the system can't decide on its own (ambiguous positions, missing facts) are flagged as requires review or incomplete, with the reasoning attached, and routed to your expert. Nothing is silently passed through.

Grounded in the law as it stood

Every verdict cites the specific provision and its effective date, so a check made today can be replayed exactly as it happened, years later.

100%

of transactions checked, not a sample

Weeks → days

typical audit-cycle compression once every transaction is checked automatically

~90%

Majority of transactions auto-validated with no exceptions raised, so expert time concentrates on the cases that actually need it

The VAT compliance dashboard: a period summary with the share of transactions checked, the VAT at risk, and the exposure over time.

Your VAT position, at a glance

Every transaction rolled up into a single view, so you always know how much VAT is at risk, and every flagged case goes to a human, never an automated guess

A validated transaction record, TX-26-03-0892, with the reasoning behind its verdict and the invoice and expected VAT amounts agreeing.

Correct

The treatment holds. Documented with the derivation, which is evidence that it was reviewed.

A regulatory update, EU Council Directive 2024/512, waiting on a reviewer with its proposed rule change and what it changed set out.

The law changes. Nothing runs until you approve it

Official sources are monitored continuously, so a new ruling arrives already drafted and linked to the provisions it touches, ready for your expert to sign off before it goes live.

A regulatory update, EU Council Directive 2024/512, waiting on a reviewer with its proposed rule change and what it changed set out.

Ask, instead of searching

Ask a plain question, the way you would ask a colleague, about risk, readiness, or rule coverage, and get a straight answer pulled from your own data instead of another screen to page through.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Correct means the treatment holds, documented with the derivation, which is evidence that it was reviewed. Needs Review means a specific finding with the provision and the reasoning, correctable before the invoice goes out rather than in the audit. Clarification Required means the case cannot be decided cleanly, for example the allocation in a chain transaction — it goes to your expert with the facts prepared and the defensible readings set out, mostly when something is missing for a sound result. The system names exactly what, instead of guessing on evidence.